<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing on Fondsites</title><link>https://fondsites.com/tags/testing/</link><description>Recent content in Testing on Fondsites</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 11:34:07 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fondsites.com/tags/testing/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Agent Evaluations: How to Test Delegated Work Before You Trust It</title><link>https://fondsites.com/ai-agents/guidebooks/agent-evaluations/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://fondsites.com/ai-agents/guidebooks/agent-evaluations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An AI agent can look impressive during a live task and still be unready for responsibility. It may solve the example you gave it, then fail on a slightly messier version. It may act confidently with missing context. It may use the wrong tool, skip a verification step, leak private information into a place it does not belong, or produce work that seems correct until a human checks the details. Agent evaluations exist because &amp;ldquo;it worked once&amp;rdquo; is not enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>