<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Source Provenance on Fondsites</title><link>https://fondsites.com/tags/source-provenance/</link><description>Recent content in Source Provenance on Fondsites</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:43:57 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fondsites.com/tags/source-provenance/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Agent Source Provenance: Keeping Evidence Attached to the Work</title><link>https://fondsites.com/ai-agents/guidebooks/agent-source-provenance/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://fondsites.com/ai-agents/guidebooks/agent-source-provenance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Agent work becomes fragile when evidence falls away from the answer. A delegate reads a source, calls a tool, compares records, drafts a polished summary, and hands back a result that sounds complete. The reviewer may see the conclusion, but not the path. They do not know which records were inspected, which sources were skipped, which facts were inferred, which claims are current, or which uncertainty was smoothed over by fluent language.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>