<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Robot Observability on Fondsites</title><link>https://fondsites.com/tags/robot-observability/</link><description>Recent content in Robot Observability on Fondsites</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:43:57 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fondsites.com/tags/robot-observability/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Robot Observability and Field Logs: Seeing What the Machine Experienced</title><link>https://fondsites.com/physical-ai-lab/guidebooks/robot-observability-field-logs/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://fondsites.com/physical-ai-lab/guidebooks/robot-observability-field-logs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A robot that cannot explain what happened will eventually become a machine people do not trust.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The explanation does not have to be theatrical. Most of the time it is a timeline, a handful of sensor readings, a map position, a software version, an operator action, a battery state, a protective stop, or a note that the robot tried the same recovery twice before asking for help. Those records may sound dry, but they decide whether a field problem becomes a fix, a rumor, or a repeated support call.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>