<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Public Trust on Fondsites</title><link>https://fondsites.com/tags/public-trust/</link><description>Recent content in Public Trust on Fondsites</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 02:06:09 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fondsites.com/tags/public-trust/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Synthetic Biology Product Claims and Public Trust</title><link>https://fondsites.com/synthetic-biology/guidebooks/product-claims-public-trust/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://fondsites.com/synthetic-biology/guidebooks/product-claims-public-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Synthetic biology has a language problem as much as a science problem. The field can make real things: enzymes, ingredients, materials, diagnostics, fragrances, fuels, research tools, cultivated tissues, and production strains that do useful work in controlled settings. It can also make claims that outrun the evidence. A product may be described as sustainable, animal-free, natural, carbon-saving, biodegradable, safer, cleaner, programmable, or identical to something familiar. Some of those claims may be fair. Some may be incomplete. Some may be technically true in one narrow sense and misleading in the way ordinary people hear them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>