<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CubeSats on Fondsites</title><link>https://fondsites.com/tags/cubesats/</link><description>Recent content in CubeSats on Fondsites</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:43:57 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fondsites.com/tags/cubesats/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Small Satellites and CubeSat Mission Design: What Shrinking the Spacecraft Changes</title><link>https://fondsites.com/spacefront/guidebooks/small-satellites-cubesat-mission-design/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://fondsites.com/spacefront/guidebooks/small-satellites-cubesat-mission-design/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Small satellites changed the emotional texture of spaceflight. A mission no longer has to begin with a building-sized spacecraft, a dedicated rocket, and a decade of development. Universities, startups, agencies, and research teams can fly compact spacecraft, learn quickly, test instruments, build constellations, and accept risk in a different way. That shift is real, but it is often misunderstood. Small does not mean simple. It means the tradeoffs are closer together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>